5/10. I'm not really sure what to make of this movie. It certainly wasn't what I was expecting. It was much much darker than I pictured it being from what little I'd heard about it before hand.
Basically a fairy tale set against the backdrop of the Spanish Civil War in 1944. That's all it really is. I'm sure there are deeper meanings and metaphors than I got out of it, but they were lost on me.
I guess you could compare this to a David Lynch film with a classical narrative structure, as it was apparently very personal to Guillermo Del Toro, the director, and it was very surreal in parts. So while I'm sure Del Toro loved it, and others around the world appeared to have loved it as well (at least judging from it's IMDB score), I was just kind alternating between being appalled and apathetic about this story. It really didn't live up to it's hype to me. To sum up how I feel about this movie: "meh".
June 30, 2011
June 26, 2011
Brick (2005)
5/10. Gritty film noir involving students of a suburban California high school. Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays Brendan, a high school loner who navigates the school's cliques to find out who murdered his ex-girlfriend.
At first this film comes off as silly. High school kids, getting mixed up in overly serious situations, bantering back and forth like criminals out of an Edward G. Robinson movie. But, if you suspend your disbelief, and overcome the extremely poor sound mixing, and are able to understand what they are saying to each other, this throwback to California noir of yesteryear ends up being pretty entertaining.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt wasn't too shabby in one of his first post Third Rock starring roles. Though I've seen better work on his part, he did the best he could with what was given.
I probably would have rated this film higher if it just weren't for the fact that these are kids in this movie. I'm sure people have heard that films are all just about playing dress up or pretend. Well that's what Brick came across as being. Like a shined up version of some high school play, like Dawson's Creek without all the "issues" or doucheness. It was entertaining enough though, I only cought myself looking at the clock a few times, plus I finished the movie, which is more than I can say for some other indie films.
At first this film comes off as silly. High school kids, getting mixed up in overly serious situations, bantering back and forth like criminals out of an Edward G. Robinson movie. But, if you suspend your disbelief, and overcome the extremely poor sound mixing, and are able to understand what they are saying to each other, this throwback to California noir of yesteryear ends up being pretty entertaining.
Joseph Gordon-Levitt wasn't too shabby in one of his first post Third Rock starring roles. Though I've seen better work on his part, he did the best he could with what was given.
I probably would have rated this film higher if it just weren't for the fact that these are kids in this movie. I'm sure people have heard that films are all just about playing dress up or pretend. Well that's what Brick came across as being. Like a shined up version of some high school play, like Dawson's Creek without all the "issues" or doucheness. It was entertaining enough though, I only cought myself looking at the clock a few times, plus I finished the movie, which is more than I can say for some other indie films.
Dark City (1950)
6/10. In Charleton Heston's first screen role he plays one of three grifters who dupe an out-of-towner out of his every penny in a poker game. The out-of-towner hangs himself and his psychopathic brother hunts down Heston and crew seeking vengeance.
Dark City was your run of the mill 50's film noir. It's most notable in my opinion for introducing us to a very young Charleton Heston. Heston really stands out in this film, with his stilted acting and intense demeanor that won him more starring roles. There were other notables including Dragnet's Jack Webb as a baddie, and M.A.S.H.'s Harry Morgan as a punchy sidekick.
Not as memorable, or dark, as most film niors, but it was entertaining nonetheless.
Dark City was your run of the mill 50's film noir. It's most notable in my opinion for introducing us to a very young Charleton Heston. Heston really stands out in this film, with his stilted acting and intense demeanor that won him more starring roles. There were other notables including Dragnet's Jack Webb as a baddie, and M.A.S.H.'s Harry Morgan as a punchy sidekick.
Not as memorable, or dark, as most film niors, but it was entertaining nonetheless.
June 25, 2011
The Crucible (1996)
7/10. This film covers that black eye on the New World known as the Salem witch trials. In the film, the town of Salem, in the colony of Massachusetts is turned upside down over accusations of witchcraft. Many are arrested and some are hanged. The thing is, the accusations all come from a group of young girls who lie to assist their own jealousies, vanities, and fears of reprisal. Once the government steps in everyone is vulnerable to the accusation of witchcraft and the whole town is whipped into mass hysteria And with strict literal puritans running the courtroom you know this won't end well.
The whole subject matter is hard to watch for me being a Christian, as it's always difficult to see your brothers and sisters portrayed as hypocrites, even if it's rightfully so.
I should note that this is based on a screenplay adaptation of Arthur Miller's most famous play, by the playwright himself. He initially wrote the Crucible as a response to having been forced to testify before the House of Representatives' Committee on Un-American Activities, that is, the McCarthy investigations in 1956. You can definitely see why the McCarthy era is now commonly referred to as a witch hunt.
On the production side, Daniel Day-Louis is excellent as always. Winona Ryder is awful as usual. When the two are acting in the same scene together, she just comes off looking like a rank amateur. It's interesting to see the great Paul Scofield on the opposite side of the bar as he was in "A Man For All Seasons". Though there's weight in some of the performances, most of the townspeople and government officials seem like caricatures, even if they have excellent King James style lines to read.
All in all, a parable of the dangers of mass hysteria. Hard to watch, but a good film nonetheless.
The whole subject matter is hard to watch for me being a Christian, as it's always difficult to see your brothers and sisters portrayed as hypocrites, even if it's rightfully so.
I should note that this is based on a screenplay adaptation of Arthur Miller's most famous play, by the playwright himself. He initially wrote the Crucible as a response to having been forced to testify before the House of Representatives' Committee on Un-American Activities, that is, the McCarthy investigations in 1956. You can definitely see why the McCarthy era is now commonly referred to as a witch hunt.
On the production side, Daniel Day-Louis is excellent as always. Winona Ryder is awful as usual. When the two are acting in the same scene together, she just comes off looking like a rank amateur. It's interesting to see the great Paul Scofield on the opposite side of the bar as he was in "A Man For All Seasons". Though there's weight in some of the performances, most of the townspeople and government officials seem like caricatures, even if they have excellent King James style lines to read.
All in all, a parable of the dangers of mass hysteria. Hard to watch, but a good film nonetheless.
Doubt (2008)
9/10. This movie elicited the exact responses from me as it intended. I attribute that to the strong writing of the story. I was not surprised to learn that this film was based on a Tony and Pulitzer Prize winning play. Aside from musicals and farce, the theater is where real drama is displayed.
The basic story line is of a strict nun who accuses a Catholic pastor of sexually abusing one of the students at the Catholic school. She doesn't do this publicly, but rather behind closed doors and in secret, mostly utilizing and referring to implications and gossip. The pastor maintains his innocence in the face of her certainty. On the third side of this triangle is another younger more naive nun who, like the audience, has doubts at different times as to the genuineness of both the accuser and the accused.
Sound confusing? That's because it is. This play/movie successfully had me second guessing the characters and myself, which I believe was it's full intention. Belying it's title, there were so many messages and truths to be felt and seen in this story that it was somewhat overwhelming. And these messages were not just for the Christian, but for all moral peoples. However, the ultimate overriding force throughout was one of doubt; which, as the pastor foretold in his opening sermon, can divide us or unite in commonality. It is ultimately up to us.
I would be remiss if I didn't mention the apt direction of the playwright, and the Oscar caliber acting of all the players. I would definitely like to see this movie again sometime.
The basic story line is of a strict nun who accuses a Catholic pastor of sexually abusing one of the students at the Catholic school. She doesn't do this publicly, but rather behind closed doors and in secret, mostly utilizing and referring to implications and gossip. The pastor maintains his innocence in the face of her certainty. On the third side of this triangle is another younger more naive nun who, like the audience, has doubts at different times as to the genuineness of both the accuser and the accused.
Sound confusing? That's because it is. This play/movie successfully had me second guessing the characters and myself, which I believe was it's full intention. Belying it's title, there were so many messages and truths to be felt and seen in this story that it was somewhat overwhelming. And these messages were not just for the Christian, but for all moral peoples. However, the ultimate overriding force throughout was one of doubt; which, as the pastor foretold in his opening sermon, can divide us or unite in commonality. It is ultimately up to us.
I would be remiss if I didn't mention the apt direction of the playwright, and the Oscar caliber acting of all the players. I would definitely like to see this movie again sometime.
June 22, 2011
Black Swan (2010)
8/10. Wow. This ballet is definitely not boring. Natalie Portman plays the leading ballerina in the NYC Ballet's production of Swan Lake. Only, as she strives for perfection in her performance, things begin to become unraveled, leading to a horrifying conclusion.
In my humble opinion, this movie can be most likened to Brian De Palma's Carrie (1976). An innocente awakens into womanhood under tremendous social pressure, and an overbearing controlling mother to stifle her at every turn. The only result can be psychosis. Not necessarily the overt parapsychological climax of Carrie, but one nearly as dramatic.
Aranofsky's camera work following Portman at every turn, and featuring more close-up shots on it's protagonist than any movie in recent memory, only heightens the tension as we follow her down her spiral into madness. Araonofsky said this film was his companion piece to The Wrestler (2008), and while it may not be as manly, it's just as hard not to look away.
In my humble opinion, this movie can be most likened to Brian De Palma's Carrie (1976). An innocente awakens into womanhood under tremendous social pressure, and an overbearing controlling mother to stifle her at every turn. The only result can be psychosis. Not necessarily the overt parapsychological climax of Carrie, but one nearly as dramatic.
Aranofsky's camera work following Portman at every turn, and featuring more close-up shots on it's protagonist than any movie in recent memory, only heightens the tension as we follow her down her spiral into madness. Araonofsky said this film was his companion piece to The Wrestler (2008), and while it may not be as manly, it's just as hard not to look away.
June 19, 2011
Caligula (1979)
2/10. I hated this movie. I couldn't even finish it.
Gore Vidal knows his Romans, and Tinto Brass knows his erotica. Unfortunately, the socio-political intrigue of the imperial court doesn't mix well with the sexual exploits of it's emperor. At least not when the founders of Penthouse magazine are doing the editing.
I didn't even watch the X-rated version with the hardcore sex scenes and yet it was almost too much to handle. This was the recently re-released R-rated version, but there's so much nudity and fornication that you begin to become desensitized to it. In reality, they weren't just doing it all the time in Rome, they did have an empire to run.
I think I may have not given it such a low score, save for the fact that the set design and lighting were too impressionistic. That's something I have little patience for, at least when dealing with historical subject matter. I imagine Hell could look something like these garish sets. And the devil may act somewhat like Peter O'Toole's over the top performance. As an avant-garde art film, I guess you could call this a win, but the sexualization of every little aspect is too much for my puritanical American mores.
Gore Vidal knows his Romans, and Tinto Brass knows his erotica. Unfortunately, the socio-political intrigue of the imperial court doesn't mix well with the sexual exploits of it's emperor. At least not when the founders of Penthouse magazine are doing the editing.
I didn't even watch the X-rated version with the hardcore sex scenes and yet it was almost too much to handle. This was the recently re-released R-rated version, but there's so much nudity and fornication that you begin to become desensitized to it. In reality, they weren't just doing it all the time in Rome, they did have an empire to run.
I think I may have not given it such a low score, save for the fact that the set design and lighting were too impressionistic. That's something I have little patience for, at least when dealing with historical subject matter. I imagine Hell could look something like these garish sets. And the devil may act somewhat like Peter O'Toole's over the top performance. As an avant-garde art film, I guess you could call this a win, but the sexualization of every little aspect is too much for my puritanical American mores.
Sisters (1973)
6/10. Sisters is among Brian De Palma's earliest works behind the directors chair. Made for American International, the production company best known for grindhouse schlock in the 60's and 70's, this picture stands out.
After witnessing a murder in an apartment on Staten Island, a feminist reporter begins an investigation into the life of the apartment's owner played by Margot Kidder. What she finds out is horrifying.
All of De Palma's touches are here: the Hitchcockian suspense; the overbearing musical score; the split screen and POV camera work; the touch of parapsychological horror. What made him famous for Carrie, can definately be seen in Sisters. I bet the once priceless Bernard Hermann was pleased to be once again working on a film with substance, instead of the run of the mill slasher fare he'd relinquished himself to in his later years. This film is definitely a stand out from the rest of American International's catalog.
I wouldn't say I liked this film, as I don't usually like horror films. It just impressed me as a well crafted film that didn't quite end up how you thought it would.
After witnessing a murder in an apartment on Staten Island, a feminist reporter begins an investigation into the life of the apartment's owner played by Margot Kidder. What she finds out is horrifying.
All of De Palma's touches are here: the Hitchcockian suspense; the overbearing musical score; the split screen and POV camera work; the touch of parapsychological horror. What made him famous for Carrie, can definately be seen in Sisters. I bet the once priceless Bernard Hermann was pleased to be once again working on a film with substance, instead of the run of the mill slasher fare he'd relinquished himself to in his later years. This film is definitely a stand out from the rest of American International's catalog.
I wouldn't say I liked this film, as I don't usually like horror films. It just impressed me as a well crafted film that didn't quite end up how you thought it would.
June 18, 2011
Sanjuro (1962)
8/10. Kurosawa's sequel to Yojimbo sees Toshiro Mifune reprising his role as the wandering samurai, this time aiding a clan in some medieval intrigue. Not as action packed or as hardcore as I recall Yojimbo being, but still keeps the viewer wondering what may happen next. Mifune plays Sanjuro thoughtfully when needed, yet at the same time a steely killer. A naked sword, unsheathed and unsettled.
Kurosawa's movies always seem to me like they could be just as interesting filmed shot for shot today as they were 50 years ago. Truly timeless.
Kurosawa's movies always seem to me like they could be just as interesting filmed shot for shot today as they were 50 years ago. Truly timeless.
True Grit (2010)
8/10. What can I say, I love movies that implement old-timey dialogue, and this has it in full. Among the Cohen brothers best films. I was surprised to see Spielberg's name attached to this as executive producer. I wonder what kind of hand he had in it's creation? Regardless, the direction of this film was excellent, but it was the brother's script that really did it for me. Not quite as authentic as The Assassination of Jesse James, but it was an excellent attempt.
June 15, 2011
Battle: Los Angeles (2011)
8/10. I wish I had seen this movie in the theaters. I remember someone telling me it was lame and that's why I skipped it. Last time I'll base my theater going on that person's opinion.
Basically it's an alien invasion movie meets a standard war film focusing on a single marine unit. Not much character development, but who cares! It's just a fun to watch, epic action movie that never slows down. Time seemed to fly by watching this film. I'd recommend it to anyone who wants to see an exciting action movie with a sci-fi edge.
Basically it's an alien invasion movie meets a standard war film focusing on a single marine unit. Not much character development, but who cares! It's just a fun to watch, epic action movie that never slows down. Time seemed to fly by watching this film. I'd recommend it to anyone who wants to see an exciting action movie with a sci-fi edge.
Spike Lee and the Double-Dolly Shot
Watching "Inside Man", I recalled Spike Lee's use of what I would say is his signature shot: the double-dolly shot. You see when filming, the camera is sometimes placed on what is known as a dolly. Essentially a miniaturized train car on miniaturized train tracks. The movement of the camera is then smooth and fluid as the platform coasts along the tracks. This shot has been utilized since the early days of film, when cameras were large and bulky and heavy and required such a mechanism to achieve any movement at all. Well, in his shot, Lee places the camera on a dolly, and the actor on a second dolly. Thus when the dollies move the actor appears to be seamlessly floating through the scenery.
Lee usually seems to incorporate this shot to signify an inevitability on the part of the character involved. For example in Malcolm X, when Malcolm is walking to the theater where he is gunned down, the shot gives the feel that his destiny is approaching.
In Inside Man, Detective Frazier's rage compels him to the door of the bank in probably the quickest double-dolly shot Lee has ever used.
And in The 25th Hour, Anna Paquin's character floats through a club as if on air.
Lee uses this shot in most of his films, in my opinion to ultimate effect. Not as a gimmick but as a tool of the narrative. The actors are more or less motionless in the double dolly, as opposed to the reverse-POV camera shots (think "Requiem For a Dream") which capture even the tiniest of movements. With the double dolly an almost out of body experience is projected onto the character. Keep an eye out for it.
Lee usually seems to incorporate this shot to signify an inevitability on the part of the character involved. For example in Malcolm X, when Malcolm is walking to the theater where he is gunned down, the shot gives the feel that his destiny is approaching.
In Inside Man, Detective Frazier's rage compels him to the door of the bank in probably the quickest double-dolly shot Lee has ever used.
And in The 25th Hour, Anna Paquin's character floats through a club as if on air.
Lee uses this shot in most of his films, in my opinion to ultimate effect. Not as a gimmick but as a tool of the narrative. The actors are more or less motionless in the double dolly, as opposed to the reverse-POV camera shots (think "Requiem For a Dream") which capture even the tiniest of movements. With the double dolly an almost out of body experience is projected onto the character. Keep an eye out for it.
Inside Man (2006)
8/10. Re-watched one of my favorite Spike Lee movies, "Inside Man". A heist movie, about a particularly perfect bank heist. It's a pretty straight forward thriller, no overt socio-political messages like in many of Lee's other works. Really, it's as much of a popcorn movie as I think Lee can muster. A tight script from first time writer Russel Gewirtz made this movie a treat to film, I'm sure. See it if you haven't.
June 12, 2011
The King's Speech (2010)
7/10 stars. Who would have thought that a movie about speech therapy could be so enthralling. I guess if you add in some psychotherapy, family drama, and geopolitical weight you can't help but spin a winning tale. The fact that it was all true makes it that much better. Must mention Danny Cohen in particular. His intriguing camera work and beautiful cinematography made this film that much more enjoyable to watch. And Colin Firth most assuredly deserved his Oscar win.
June 11, 2011
Super 8 (2011)
7/10 stars. I think the trailers for this movie were a little more exciting than the movie itself. Don't get me wrong, I liked Super 8. It just felt rushed in production. The reviews say Abrams was trying to channel Spielberg, which was pretty blatant, including several Close Encounters homages, it just didn't have all the emotional punch that Spielberg usually manages. It was flashy and fun sure, but don't go in with too high of expectations. I think the best example were the conversations among the kids. Spielberg's handling of such things always felt way natural with multiple ad libbed dialogues going on at once (think Goonies or ET). Abrams just doesn't have that same kind of handle, everything was scripted, from a pretty predictable and emotionally dry script... Still, I liked it.
Here's the misleading trailer that made it seem totally epic:
Here's the misleading trailer that made it seem totally epic:
Fade In
This is a poorly written, rarely updated, blog for my movie reviews and other movie related posts and comments.
Labels include:
- spoiler: contains spoilers
- */10: rating number out of 10
- review: full review of the film including summary
- comment: brief comment after viewing
- analysis: comment or review breaking down themes, tropes, metaphors and other meanings
- essay: discussing a specific thesis
- coming soon: regarding upcoming releases
- news: current events
- non-fiction: regarding documentaries, books about film, history of film, etc.
- art: movie related visual artwork
- image: photo or other image
- video: video clip
- trailer: movie trailer
- music: soundtracks and movie music
- script: screenplay
- quote: quotation
- making-of: regarding behind the scenes information
- people: regarding filmmakers, cast and crew
- tech: regarding movie technology and technique in film production and post-production
- write: regarding screenwriting
- theater: related to the movie theater and the movie theater experience
- me: personal, regarding myself specifically
Note: my rating system is entirely subjective, completely personal. Out of ten, here's what the numbers mean:
0 - never want to see again
1 - really hated
2 - hated
3 - really didn't like
4 - didn't like
5 - so-so, okay
6 - pretty good
7 - liked
8 - really liked
9 - loved
10 - absolutey loved
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)